On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:27:05PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Supposedly on some platforms we can get extra atomicity guarantees for > CURPOS if we write it between the CURCNTR and CURBASE. Let's move the > CURPOS handling into the platform specific hooks to make the possible > without having to pass the calculated CURPOS around. And while at it, > do the same for the CURBASE to avoid passing that either. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm convinced, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
