On 07/03/2017 09:13, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:42:26AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 06/03/2017 15:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
If we allow the user to convert a GTT mmap address into a userptr, we
may end up in recursion hell, where currently we hit a mutex deadlock
but other possibilities include use-after-free during the
unbind/cancel_userptr.
I thought we already disallowed that and indeed
igt/gem_userptr_blits/invalid-gtt-mapping succeeds here - what am I
missing?
Michał presented this deadlock:
[ 143.203989] gem_userptr_bli D 0 902 898 0x00000000
[ 143.204054] Call Trace:
[ 143.204137] __schedule+0x511/0x1180
[ 143.204195] ? pci_mmcfg_check_reserved+0xc0/0xc0
[ 143.204274] schedule+0x57/0xe0
[ 143.204327] schedule_timeout+0x383/0x670
[ 143.204374] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x187/0x280
[ 143.204457] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 143.204507] ? usleep_range+0x110/0x110
[ 143.204657] ? irq_exit+0x89/0x100
[ 143.204710] ? retint_kernel+0x2d/0x2d
[ 143.204794] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x187/0x280
[ 143.204857] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x33/0x60
[ 143.204944] wait_for_common+0x1f0/0x2f0
[ 143.205006] ? out_of_line_wait_on_atomic_t+0x170/0x170
[ 143.205103] ? wake_up_q+0xa0/0xa0
[ 143.205159] ? flush_workqueue_prep_pwqs+0x15a/0x2c0
[ 143.205237] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
[ 143.205292] flush_workqueue+0x2e9/0xbb0
[ 143.205339] ? flush_workqueue+0x163/0xbb0
[ 143.205418] ? __schedule+0x533/0x1180
[ 143.205498] ? check_flush_dependency+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 143.205681] i915_gem_userptr_mn_invalidate_range_start+0x1c7/0x270 [i915]
[ 143.205865] ? i915_gem_userptr_dmabuf_export+0x40/0x40 [i915]
[ 143.205955] __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0xc6/0x120
[ 143.206044] ? __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start+0x51/0x120
[ 143.206123] zap_page_range_single+0x1c7/0x1f0
[ 143.206171] ? unmap_single_vma+0x160/0x160
[ 143.206260] ? unmap_mapping_range+0xa9/0x1b0
[ 143.206308] ? vma_interval_tree_subtree_search+0x75/0xd0
[ 143.206397] unmap_mapping_range+0x18f/0x1b0
[ 143.206444] ? zap_vma_ptes+0x70/0x70
[ 143.206524] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x67/0xa0
[ 143.206723] i915_gem_release_mmap+0x1ba/0x1c0 [i915]
[ 143.206846] i915_vma_unbind+0x5c2/0x690 [i915]
[ 143.206925] ? __lock_is_held+0x52/0x100
[ 143.207076] i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x1db/0x650 [i915]
[ 143.207236] i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x1d3/0x3b0 [i915]
[ 143.207377] ? i915_gem_set_tiling_ioctl+0x5/0x3b0 [i915]
[ 143.207457] drm_ioctl+0x36c/0x670
[ 143.207535] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.0+0x1a/0x30
[ 143.207730] ? i915_gem_object_set_tiling+0x650/0x650 [i915]
[ 143.207793] ? drm_getunique+0x120/0x120
[ 143.207875] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x996/0x14a0
[ 143.207939] ? vm_insert_page+0x340/0x340
[ 143.208028] ? up_write+0x28/0x50
[ 143.208086] ? vm_mmap_pgoff+0x160/0x190
[ 143.208163] do_vfs_ioctl+0x12c/0xa60
[ 143.208218] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x35/0x40
[ 143.208267] ? ioctl_preallocate+0x150/0x150
[ 143.208353] ? __do_page_fault+0x36a/0x6e0
[ 143.208400] ? mark_held_locks+0x23/0xc0
[ 143.208479] ? up_read+0x1f/0x40
[ 143.208526] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x5/0xc6
[ 143.208669] ? __fget_light+0xa7/0xc0
[ 143.208747] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x70
[ 143.208808] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
That would mean another process never exits cancel_userptr, correct? Do
we have a trace of the other end?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
