Hi,
On 06/03/2017 23:54, Matthew Auld wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 7c20601fe1de..0a6ed2c54629 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3975,6 +3975,8 @@ void i915_gem_object_init(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
obj->ops = ops;
+ obj->page_size = I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
+
reservation_object_init(&obj->__builtin_resv);
obj->resv = &obj->__builtin_resv;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
index 33b0dc4782a9..31bcf87d3745 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_object.h
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long page_size; /* 4K(default), 64K, 2M, 1G */
+
Could we get away with an unsigned int for this field and the colouring,
function arguments, etc following in subsequent patches? Or it is
expected that >4G pages might happen in some reasonable time? Maybe a
pointless saving, I don't know, just asking.
Regards,
Tvrtko
/**
* Have we taken a reference for the object for incomplete GPU
* activity?
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
