Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Flush idle work when changing missed-irq fault injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/03/2017 10:15, Chris Wilson wrote:
In order for the missed-irq update to take effect, the device must be
idle. So when the user updates the fault injection via debugfs, idle the
device.

v2: Idle is explicitly required for setting test_irq, and good behaviour
for clearing the missed_irq.

Testcase: igt/drv_missed_irq
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 4a3e5b9552f8..511d3541d3d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -4138,6 +4138,39 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_wedged_fops,
 			"%llu\n");

 static int
+fault_irq_set(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned long *irq, u64 val)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	err = i915_gem_wait_for_idle(i915,
+				     I915_WAIT_LOCKED |
+				     I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_unlock;
+
+	/* Retire to kick idle work */
+	i915_gem_retire_requests(i915);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915->gt.active_requests);
+
+	*irq = val & INTEL_INFO(i915)->ring_mask;

Looks like a type width mismatch on 32-bit.

Should we change missed_irq_rings to an u64?

+	mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+
+	/* Flush idle worker to disarm irq */
+	while (flush_delayed_work(&i915->gt.idle_work))
+		;

Worth sticking a schedule in here or something? Not worth it for debugfs I guess since we don't have it elsewhere.

+
+	return 0;
+
+err_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int
 i915_ring_missed_irq_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
@@ -4149,18 +4182,8 @@ i915_ring_missed_irq_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 static int
 i915_ring_missed_irq_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
-	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
-	int ret;
-
-	/* Lock against concurrent debugfs callers */
-	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-	dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings = val;
-	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-
-	return 0;
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;
+	return fault_irq_set(i915, &i915->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings, val);
 }

 DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_ring_missed_irq_fops,
@@ -4180,13 +4203,11 @@ i915_ring_test_irq_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 static int
 i915_ring_test_irq_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = data;
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;

-	val &= INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->ring_mask;
+	val &= INTEL_INFO(i915)->ring_mask;
 	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Masking interrupts on rings 0x%08llx\n", val);
-	dev_priv->gpu_error.test_irq_rings = val;
-
-	return 0;
+	return fault_irq_set(i915, &i915->gpu_error.test_irq_rings, val);
 }

 DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(i915_ring_test_irq_fops,


Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux