On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:48:46AM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 25 February 2017 at 23:25, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Only if we allocated the layer and the lower level failed should we
> > remove this layer when unwinding. Otherwise we ignore the overlapping
> > entries by overwritting the old layer with scratch.
> overwriting
>
> >
> > Fixes: c5d092a4293f ("drm/i915: Remove bitmap tracking for used-pml4")
> > Fixes: e2b763caa6eb ("drm/i915: Remove bitmap tracking for used-pdpes")
> > Reported-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99948
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99947 ?
Oops, bad cut'n'paste.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
