Re: [PATCH resend 02/15] drm/i915/dsi: Merge intel_dsi_disable/enable into their respective callers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:08:32 +0100
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> intel_dsi_disable/enable only have one caller, merge them into their
> respective callers.
> 
> Change msleep(2) into usleep_range(2000, 5000) to make checkpatch happy,
> otherwise no functional changes.
> 
> The main advantage of this change is that it makes it easier to
> follow all the steps of the panel enable / disable sequence when
> reading the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> index 2f0af98..e808dce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
> @@ -505,32 +505,6 @@ static void intel_dsi_port_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> -	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> -	enum port port;
> -
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> -
> -	if (is_cmd_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> -		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> -			I915_WRITE(MIPI_MAX_RETURN_PKT_SIZE(port), 8 * 4);
> -	} else {
> -		msleep(20); /* XXX */
> -		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> -			dpi_send_cmd(intel_dsi, TURN_ON, false, port);
> -		msleep(100);
> -
> -		drm_panel_enable(intel_dsi->panel);
> -
> -		intel_dsi_port_enable(encoder);
> -	}
> -
> -	intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_dsi->attached_connector);
> -}
> -
>  static void intel_dsi_prepare(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder,
>  			      struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config);
>  
> @@ -540,6 +514,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> @@ -586,7 +561,21 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  
>  	/* Enable port in pre-enable phase itself because as per hw team
>  	 * recommendation, port should be enabled befor plane & pipe */
> -	intel_dsi_enable(encoder);
> +	if (is_cmd_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> +		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> +			I915_WRITE(MIPI_MAX_RETURN_PKT_SIZE(port), 8 * 4);
> +	} else {
> +		msleep(20); /* XXX */
> +		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> +			dpi_send_cmd(intel_dsi, TURN_ON, false, port);
> +		msleep(100);
> +
> +		drm_panel_enable(intel_dsi->panel);
> +
> +		intel_dsi_port_enable(encoder);
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_dsi->attached_connector);
>  }
>  
>  static void intel_dsi_enable_nop(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> @@ -631,42 +620,6 @@ static void intel_dsi_pre_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void intel_dsi_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> -{
> -	struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev;
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> -	enum port port;
> -	u32 temp;
> -
> -	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
> -
> -	if (is_vid_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> -		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> -			wait_for_dsi_fifo_empty(intel_dsi, port);

I realize that this is just moving the code around and the change seems
reasonable. So this is 
Reviewed-by: Bob Paauwe <bob.j.paauwe@xxxxxxxxx>

But if I'm understanding the b-spec correctly, at least for BXT, the
wait for fifo empty above should only be necessary for command mode,
not video mode. 

> -
> -		intel_dsi_port_disable(encoder);
> -		msleep(2);
> -	}
> -
> -	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> -		/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> -		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
> -
> -		intel_dsi_reset_clocks(encoder, port);
> -		I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
> -
> -		temp = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> -		temp &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> -		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), temp);
> -
> -		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> -	}
> -	/* if disable packets are sent before sending shutdown packet then in
> -	 * some next enable sequence send turn on packet error is observed */
> -	drm_panel_disable(intel_dsi->panel);
> -}
> -
>  static void intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
> @@ -716,11 +669,38 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder->base.dev);
>  	struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> +	enum port port;
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n");
>  
> -	intel_dsi_disable(encoder);
> +	if (is_vid_mode(intel_dsi)) {
> +		for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports)
> +			wait_for_dsi_fifo_empty(intel_dsi, port);
> +
> +		intel_dsi_port_disable(encoder);
> +		usleep_range(2000, 5000);
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_dsi_port(port, intel_dsi->ports) {
> +		/* Panel commands can be sent when clock is in LP11 */
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x0);
> +
> +		intel_dsi_reset_clocks(encoder, port);
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_EOT_DISABLE(port), CLOCKSTOP);
> +
> +		val = I915_READ(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port));
> +		val &= ~VID_MODE_FORMAT_MASK;
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DSI_FUNC_PRG(port), val);
> +
> +		I915_WRITE(MIPI_DEVICE_READY(port), 0x1);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * if disable packets are sent before sending shutdown packet then in
> +	 * some next enable sequence send turn on packet error is observed
> +	 */
> +	drm_panel_disable(intel_dsi->panel);
>  
>  	intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder);
>  



-- 
--
Bob Paauwe                  
Bob.J.Paauwe@xxxxxxxxx
IOTG / PED Software Organization
Intel Corp.  Folsom, CA
(916) 356-6193    

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux