Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] drm/i915: Immediately process a reset before starting waiting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 23/02/2017 07:44, Chris Wilson wrote:
As we handoff the GPU reset to the waiter, we need to check we don't
miss a wakeup if it has already been sent prior to us starting the wait.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
index ee601e13e28a..eaa333a35f7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_request.c
@@ -1081,8 +1081,10 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 	trace_i915_gem_request_wait_begin(req, flags);

 	add_wait_queue(&req->execute, &exec);
-	if (flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED)
+	if (flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED) {
 		add_wait_queue(errq, &reset);
+		__i915_wait_request_check_and_reset(req);
+	}

 	intel_wait_init(&wait);

@@ -1120,7 +1122,8 @@ long i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 		goto complete;

 	set_current_state(state);
-	if (intel_engine_add_wait(req->engine, &wait))
+	if (intel_engine_add_wait(req->engine, &wait) ||
+	    flags & I915_WAIT_LOCKED)
 		/* In order to check that we haven't missed the interrupt
 		 * as we enabled it, we need to kick ourselves to do a
 		 * coherent check on the seqno before we sleep.


Didn't figure this second bit - what's happening here?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux