On 02/20/2017 11:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So I think we need a quick revert of this commit or a quick stable >> follow-up to unbreak things on our side. > I'd much prefer we just register control nodes for vmwgfx only, with a > commit message explaining in detail what exactly your control tool is > using (i.e. which ioctl), plus links to the source code for future > references. Also not sold on the immediate revert, this stuff has been > merged since months. > -Daniel > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~thomash/open-vm-tools/commit/?h=feature/thellstrom/resolutionKMS&id=9bf65a22d5a06d3a706bc14578619a56e06f8a24 /Thomas _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
