Hi,
On 20-02-17 12:00, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, "Srinivas, Vidya" <vidya.srinivas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Jani. I will rebase and re-submit and also to remove drm_panel
interface dependency, I am planning to create panel sequence callbacks
in intel_dsi structure itself. Is this approach okay?
I think that's unnecessary overhead. I've come to think we should just
do what Hans suggested in his patch [1]. It's easiest, and we don't
really benefit anything from the drm_panel interface or function pointer
chasing.
Hans, do you think you'll have the time or motivation to refresh your
series, or should we just let Vidya do this?
As an added difficulty, there's Madhav doing the Geminilake enabling at
the same time, and these two/three series [2][3][4] are bound to
conflict to some extent.
I've my series rebased in a personal repo. As I was planning on resubmitting
it at some point in the future. I can send out a new version right now if
you want ...
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
