Applied to upstream/master Rob. On 2017-02-17 11:35 AM, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> On 16/02/17 06:31, Oscar Mateo wrote:I guess no one has needed to change the verbosity level of the GuC logs. Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/intel_guc_logger.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/intel_guc_logger.c b/tools/intel_guc_logger.c index 159a54e..c9ea60d 100644 --- a/tools/intel_guc_logger.c +++ b/tools/intel_guc_logger.c @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int parse_options(int opt, int opt_index, void *data) switch(opt) { case 'v': verbosity_level = atoi(optarg); - igt_assert_f(verbosity_level < 0 || verbosity_level > 3, "invalid input for -v option\n"); + igt_assert_f(verbosity_level >= 0 && verbosity_level <= 3, "invalid input for -v option\n"); igt_debug("verbosity level to be used is %d\n", verbosity_level); break; case 'o':_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
