On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:02:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> Make the function useful for resetting, not just setting, the ELD. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 3 +++ > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >> index 24e7b282f16c..362036360724 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > >> @@ -3430,6 +3430,9 @@ void drm_edid_to_eld(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid) > >> > >> memset(eld, 0, sizeof(connector->eld)); > >> > >> + if (!edid) > >> + return; > >> + > >> connector->latency_present[0] = false; > >> connector->latency_present[1] = false; > >> connector->video_latency[0] = 0; > > > > /me thinks the check should be after all these. > > D'oh! > > > Hmm. Actually the cea ext block check below should be safe wrt. > > edid==NULL, so not sure we need this at all. > > I'd just like to be explicit and avoid the debug message on missing CEA > extensions if the whole EDID is missing. Fair enough. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx