On ke, 2017-02-15 at 10:59 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > We do not need the BKL struct_mutex in order to allocate a GEM object, > nor to create the framebuffer, so resist the temptation to take the BKL > willy nilly. As this changes the locking contract around internal API > calls, the patch is a little larger than a plain removal of a pair of > mutex_lock/unlock. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, assuming we have enough lockdep_assert_held sprinkled; Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
