On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:23:51PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2017 13:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:23:24PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * Emit the two workaround batch buffers, recording the offset from the
> >>+ * start of the workaround batch buffer object for each and their
> >>+ * respective sizes.
> >>+ */
> >>+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_bb_fn); i++) {
> >>+ wa_bb[i]->offset = ALIGN(batch_ptr - batch, CACHELINE_BYTES);
> >>+ batch_ptr = wa_bb_fn[i](engine, batch_ptr);
> >>+ wa_bb[i]->size = batch_ptr - batch + wa_bb[i]->offset;
> >
> >wa_bb[i]->size = batch_ptr - (batch + wa_bb[i]->offset);
> >?
Also should it be
batch_ptr = wa_bb_fn[i](engine, batch + wa_bb[i]->offset);
?
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
