Re: [PATCH igt] intel-ci: Minimal exercise of explicit fencing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:54:21AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Ping? And any feedback from the earlier ringfill-fds?
> > -Chris
> 
> 
> Sent ack on the ringfill test. This one has been queued for a test
> round at farm2.
> 
> For those following along and smelling chances of getting their
> $favoritefeatureoftheday into BAT, I'm being a little more lenient
> than I should with allowing more tests into fast-feedback at this
> time. As soon as we can deploy Ezbench-driven extended testing (not
> far now btw), fast-feedback will go on a diet.

Unless that is accompanied by some coverage based feedback methodology
consider me grumpy. I wish that we had the tools for BAT to be an
automatic selection of the testcases that gave excellent coverage and
sensitivity.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux