Rami Ben Hassine schreef op do 26-01-2017 om 16:36 [+0100]:
> From: ramibh <ramix.ben.hassine@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is atomic modesetting acceptance tests added to
> feat_profile.json. Wating for your feedback.
>
> ---
> tests/feat_profile.json | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/feat_profile.json b/tests/feat_profile.json
> index 251dfd9..bba4b3c 100644
> --- a/tests/feat_profile.json
> +++ b/tests/feat_profile.json
> @@ -3,5 +3,11 @@
> "include_tests" : "psr",
> "exclude_tests" : "",
> "target_rate" : 90
> - }
> + },
> + "atomic-modesetting":{
> + "include_tests" : " kms_atomic_transition kms_atomic
> kms_crtc_background_color kms_cursor_legacy Kms_cursor_crc kms_flip
> kms_flip_event_leak kms_flip_tiling kms_plane kms_plane_lowres
> kms_plane_multiple kms_panel_fitting kms_plane_scaling
> kms_psr_sink_crc kms_rmfb kms_sink_crc_basic testdisplay",
Is the capital K in kms_cursor_crc intentional?
I think adding kms_rotation_crc and kms_universal_plane would be good
too, but since we're already adding most of the kms tests, why don't we
just add all kms tests?
> + "exclude_tests" : "",
> + "target_rate" : 90
> +
> +
> }Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
