If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least I can do is not muddle the comment up too. Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c index a1b7eec58be2..b0eec762b9b4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream, * userspace. * * Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the - * tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad + * tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad * and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the * Gen PRM naming convention. * -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
