On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:02:14PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:50:28PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As we add new generations, we should keep detecting new system
> > development platforms that were temporarily enabled (via
> > "i915.alpha_support") and now superseded by production systems. To make
> > it easier to add more platforms, split the if into a series of logical
> > operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index 008fc1e62a69..c2c210b0f47f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -782,8 +782,12 @@ static void i915_workqueues_cleanup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > */
> > static void intel_detect_preproduction_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > - if (IS_HSW_EARLY_SDV(dev_priv) ||
> > - IS_SKL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, SKL_REVID_F0))
> > + bool sdv = false;
>
> Presumably not all SDVs use pre-production silicon, so the name of
> this variable feels a bit off. Also since it doesn't actually check
> anything about the actual board we can't even say that it's an
> actual SDV, so the HSW_EARLY_SDV() macro seems somewhat poorly named
> to me as well.
I started with bool preproduction; but that eats too many characters.
Ideas for something short and snappy? bool alpha_hw? bool alpha?
-Chris
>
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
