Re: [PATCH] x86/gpu: GLK uses the same GMS values as SKL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So don't forget to reserve its stolen memory bits.
>> 
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
>> Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> Found by code inspection. This is completely untested since I don't have
>> GLK hardware.
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
>> index 6a08e25..23c4f1c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
>> @@ -526,6 +526,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_early_ids[] __initconst = {
>>  	INTEL_SKL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
>>  	INTEL_BXT_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
>>  	INTEL_KBL_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
>> +	INTEL_GLK_IDS(&gen9_early_ops),
>>  };
>
> There's no INTEL_GLK_IDS() upstream - is there any dependency here on other 
> changes to the i915 GPU driver?

It's in our -next. Ack for merging this through drm-intel along with the
deps?

BR,
Jani.

>
> Thanks,
>
> 	Ingo
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux