On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:12:21PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On to, 2017-01-19 at 11:41 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Some state is coupled into the device lifetime outside of the > > load/unload timeframe and requires teardown during final unreference > > from drm_dev_release(). For example, dmabufs hold both a device and > > module reference and may live longer than expected (i.e. the current > > pattern of the driver tearing down its state and then releasing a > > reference to the drm device) and yet touch driver private state when > > destroyed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm pretty sure I sent this once already, but here goes; This is the old one now, as it had to undergo some surgery to make Laurent happy. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
