On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Anusha Srivatsa
<anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC.
> As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated
> status to show when the HuC is loaded and ready for use. You cannot use
> the loaded status as with the GuC as the HuC is verified after it is
> loaded and is not usable until it is verified.
>
> v2: removed the forewakes as the registers are already force-woken.
> (T.Ursulin)
> v3: rebased on top of drm-tip. Removed any reference to intel_huc.h
> v4: rebased. Rename I915_PARAM_HAS_HUC to I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS.
> Remove intel_is_huc_valid() since it is used only in one place.
> Put the case of I915_PARAM_HAS_HUC() in the right place.
> v5: rebased. Add a comment to specify that I915_READ(reg)
> does not read garbage value. The register HUC_STATUS2 is force
> woken and no rpm is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 7 +++++++
> include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index d1197aa..4ae69eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> #include "i915_trace.h"
> #include "i915_vgpu.h"
> #include "intel_drv.h"
> +#include "intel_uc.h"
>
> static struct drm_driver driver;
>
> @@ -315,6 +316,12 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> case I915_PARAM_MIN_EU_IN_POOL:
> value = INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->sseu.min_eu_in_pool;
> break;
> + case I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS:
> + /* The register is already force-woken. We dont need
> + * any rpm here
> + */
I'm pretty sure this is broken - if the chip is runtime suspended all
writes will return 0. There's no forcewake thing going on, that is
separate from rpm. Has this been tested? Just a drive-by comment since
I checked whether we do have the userspace for this stuff.
-Daniel
> + value = I915_READ(HUC_STATUS2) & HUC_FW_VERIFIED;
> + break;
> case I915_PARAM_MMAP_GTT_VERSION:
> /* Though we've started our numbering from 1, and so class all
> * earlier versions as 0, in effect their value is undefined as
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> index da32c2f..57093b4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
> @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_irq_wait {
> * priorities and the driver will attempt to execute batches in priority order.
> */
> #define I915_PARAM_HAS_SCHEDULER 41
> +#define I915_PARAM_HUC_STATUS 42
>
> typedef struct drm_i915_getparam {
> __s32 param;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
