On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:22:31 +0100, Jerome Anand wrote: > > + had_ops_v1 = had_ops_v1; /* unused */ Until now I didn't realize that the whole v1 stuff is never used in the current patchset. Will it be ever used in future? If not, can't we clean it up? It's a bunch of codes, including the messy union definitions. If there is no v3 or whatever, we can even get rid of the whole indirect calls. And if v1 (and the indirect ops calls) should be kept, actually what is the difference between v1 and v2, why both implementations do exist? Please elaborate in comments. thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
