Re: [PATCH v4] lib/scatterlist: Avoid potential scatterlist entry overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> -       for (i = 1; i < n_pages; ++i)
>>>>> +       for (i = 1; i < n_pages; ++i) {

>>>> // Are compilers so stupid doing calculation per iteration in
>>>> for-conditional?
>>>> // for (i = 0; i + 1 < n_pages; i++) ?

>>> I didn't get what you meant here?

>> Why do we start from 1? I see here two micro (?) optimizations:
>> 1) starting from 1 on believe that compiler dumb enough to every time
>> do a calculation in condition;

> The existing code starts from 1 because the pfn condition looks up page i -
> 1. I don't feel there is a need to change that as well.

>> 2) ++i instead of i++, but this is just matter of style, it's not a c++.

> Note that I haven't changed the existing code in this respect. I am happy to
> change it though.

Yes, this is another story. Just a side note to existing code, indeed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux