On 10 January 2017 at 17:31, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 05:54:57PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:43:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > Use drm_accurate_vblank_count so we have the full 32 bit to represent
>> > the frame counter and userspace has a simpler way of knowing when the
>> > counter wraps around.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 6 +++---
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > index b9beb5955dae..75fb1f66cc0c 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > @@ -1557,7 +1557,6 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> > struct drm_driver *driver = dev_priv->drm.driver;
>> > uint32_t crcs[5];
>> > int head, tail;
>> > - u32 frame;
>> >
>> > spin_lock(&pipe_crc->lock);
>> > if (pipe_crc->source) {
>> > @@ -1612,8 +1611,9 @@ static void display_pipe_crc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> > crcs[2] = crc2;
>> > crcs[3] = crc3;
>> > crcs[4] = crc4;
>> > - frame = driver->get_vblank_counter(&dev_priv->drm, pipe);
>> > - drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(&crtc->base, true, frame, crcs);
>> > + drm_crtc_add_crc_entry(&crtc->base, true,
>> > + drm_accurate_vblank_count(&crtc->base),
>>
>> My assumption would be that this gets called after the vblank irq
>> handler, so using the _accurate version seems a bit overkill.
>
> Since we're at like v15 of this I figured I'll pull this in, and we can
> polish this a bit more later. Tomeu, can you pls do that follow-up patch
> and get Ville to review+merge it.
At least on the SKL and SNB I have here, the -sequence subtests in
kms_pipe_crc_basic fail if I replace the call to
drm_accurate_vblank_count with drm_crtc_vblank_count.
Any ideas on why this could be?
Thanks,
Tomeu
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
