Hey, On 13 January 2017 at 09:37, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 07:27:03PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: >> It would make sense, but then gbm_surface_create_with_modifiers takes >> a fixed pixel format and a list of acceptable modifiers (which to me >> seems like the right way around as an API), so whenever I was creating >> a surface, I'd have to walk through and create a new list, flipped >> back the other way. > > Yeah, for that your original order makes more sense, even if it > potentially uses more memory. Given the size of framebuffers, I'm really not concerned by the in-memory size of a format list. :) Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
