On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:11:20AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 11/01/2017 21:09, Chris Wilson wrote: > >Third retroactive test, make sure that the seqno waiters are woken. > > There are some open questions from the previous round (early > December), not least of which is that I think we really need good > comments in tests. Especially ones like this one which is pretty > advanced. We need an overall description and some commentary on the > stages. It is not straightforward to reverse engineer this, so doing > it every time this code will need some attention for one reason or > the other will be a PITA. I added that comment! -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
