On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:55:54AM -0800, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> From: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The HuC authentication is done by host2guc call. The HuC RSA keys
> are sent to GuC for authentication.
>
> v2: rebased on top of drm-intel-nightly.
> changed name format and upped version 1.7.
> v3: rebased on top of drm-intel-nightly.
> v4: changed wait_for_automic to wait_for
> v5: rebased.
> v7: rebased.
> v8: rebased.
> v9: rebased. Rename intel_huc_auh() to intel_guc_auth_huc()
> and place the prototype in intel_guc.h,correct the comments.
> v10: rebased.
> v11: rebased.
> v12: rebased on top of drm-tip
> v13: rebased. Moved intel_guc_auth_huc from i915_guc_submission.c
> to intel_uc.c.Update dev to dev_priv in intel_guc_auth_huc().
> Renamed HOST2GUC_ACTION_AUTHENTICATE_HUC TO INTEL_GUC_ACTION_
> AUTHENTICATE_HUC
> v14: rebased.
> v15: rebased. Add newline on DRM_ERRORs that already dont have one.
> v16: rebased. Replace wait_for with intel_wait_for_register() since
> the latter employs sleep optimisations for quick responses- as pointed
> out by Chris Wilson.
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdecko@xxxxxxxxx>
Typo in my email ;(
> Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> index ed1ab40..ce4e05e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_fwif.h
> @@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ enum intel_guc_action {
> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_EXIT_S_STATE = 0x502,
> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SLPC_REQUEST = 0x3003,
> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_UK_LOG_ENABLE_LOGGING = 0x0E000,
> + INTEL_GUC_ACTION_AUTHENTICATE_HUC = 0x4000,
Can we keep actions in order of their code values?
> INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LIMIT
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> index ed57ab3..0508054 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
> @@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> intel_uc_fw_status_repr(guc_fw->fetch_status),
> intel_uc_fw_status_repr(guc_fw->load_status));
>
> + intel_guc_auth_huc(dev_priv);
> +
> if (i915.enable_guc_submission) {
> if (i915.guc_log_level >= 0)
> gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index c6be352..d1a4d79 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static bool intel_guc_recv(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 *status)
> int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
> - u32 status;
> + u32 status = 0;
> int i;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -71,7 +71,11 @@ int intel_guc_send(struct intel_guc *guc, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> * up to that length of time, then switch to a slower sleep-wait loop.
> * No inte_guc_send command should ever take longer than 10ms.
> */
> - ret = wait_for_us(intel_guc_recv(guc, &status), 10);
> + ret = intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
> + HUC_STATUS2,
> + HUC_FW_VERIFIED,
> + HUC_FW_VERIFIED,
> + 50);
> if (ret)
> ret = wait_for(intel_guc_recv(guc, &status), 10);
> if (status != INTEL_GUC_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> @@ -140,3 +144,65 @@ int intel_guc_log_control(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 control_val)
>
> return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_guc_auth_huc() - authenticate ucode
> + * @dev_priv: the drm_i915_device
> + *
> + * Triggers a HuC fw authentication request to the GuC via intel_guc_action_
> + * authenticate_huc interface.
> + * interface.
> + */
> +void intel_guc_auth_huc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> + struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
> + struct intel_huc *huc = &dev_priv->huc;
> + struct i915_vma *vma;
> + int ret;
> + u32 data[2];
> +
> + /* Bypass the case where there is no HuC firmware */
> + if (huc->fw.fetch_status == INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE ||
> + huc->fw.load_status == INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NONE)
To catch the case when there is no Huc fw, maybe only first check is needed
as in intel_huc_load()?
> + return;
> +
> + if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS) {
> + DRM_ERROR("HuC: GuC fw wasn't loaded. Can't authenticate\n");
This shall never happen as this function is called from guc_setup() only after
successful guc fw load.
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (huc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS) {
> + DRM_ERROR("HuC: fw wasn't loaded. Nothing to authenticate\n");
Hmm, we should already have error message about failed huc fw loading.
Do we need to report other obvious failures?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(huc->fw.obj, NULL, 0, 0, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(vma)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("pin failed %d\n", (int)PTR_ERR(vma));
Please be more descriptive, what about "failed to pin huc fw obj" ?
> + return;
> + }
> +
> +
> + /* Invalidate GuC TLB to let GuC take the latest updates to GTT. */
> + I915_WRITE(GEN8_GTCR, GEN8_GTCR_INVALIDATE);
> +
> + /* Specify auth action and where public signature is. */
> + data[0] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_AUTHENTICATE_HUC;
> + data[1] = i915_ggtt_offset(vma) + huc->fw.rsa_offset;
> +
> + ret = intel_guc_send(guc, data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("HuC: GuC did not ack Auth request\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check authentication status, it should be done by now */
> + ret = wait_for((I915_READ(HUC_STATUS2) & HUC_FW_VERIFIED) > 0, 50);
> + if (ret) {
> + DRM_ERROR("HuC: Authentication failed\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
In other place you said:
"I think we need a message for the case when there is no failure."
What about adding message here that confirms Huc authentication?
> +out:
> + i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> index 7df57c1..6ba56e18 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ int intel_guc_sample_forcewake(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc);
> int intel_guc_log_control(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 control_val);
> +void intel_guc_auth_huc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>
> /* intel_guc_loader.c */
> extern void intel_guc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
