On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 03:31:19PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:36:37AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > Insulate users from changes to the internal hole tracking within > >> > struct drm_mm_node by using an accessor for hole_follows. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 12 ++++++------ > >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 4 ++-- > >> > >> This required some wragling in i915_vma.c to make it apply to drm-misc, > >> and then resolving the conflict in drm-tip. Please double-check when > >> rebasing that I didn't botch it up. > > > > You'll just have to undo it again in later patches. You might as well > > wait until you have the trees converged. > > Well damage done, but there wasn't anything in later patches (yet). > And with the merge it's resolved (or should be if I haven't botched > the merges) and should look identical to your baseline again. The changes were transparent; you did a good job - rebased cleanly and a diff against the old head showed nothing mysterious. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
