On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 12:12 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> This check is useful for drivers that do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set but
> have atomic modesetting internally implemented. Wrap the check into a
> function since this is used in many places and as a bonus, the function
> name helps to document what the check is for.
>
> v2:
> Change return type to bool (Ville)
> Move the function drm_atomic.h (Daniel)
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fbcon.c | 3 ++-
> include/drm/drm_atomic.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h
> index 8cc7ca2..43db162 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_atomic.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_atomic.h
> @@ -419,5 +419,16 @@ drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset(const struct drm_crtc_state
> *state)
> state->connectors_changed;
> }
>
> +/* drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - check if the driver implements
Shouldn't this be
/**
* drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset - ...
so it is included in the generated documentation?
Ander
> + * atomic_commit()
> + * @dev: DRM device
> + *
> + * This check is useful if drivers do not have DRIVER_ATOMIC set but
> + * have atomic modesetting internally implemented.
> + */
> +static inline bool drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(struct drm_device *dev)
> +{
> + return dev->mode_config.funcs->atomic_commit ? true : false;
> +}
>
> #endif /* DRM_ATOMIC_H_ */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
