The code was moved, but the comment not updated. It confused me.
Fixes: 7f4c62840cc4 ("drm/i915: Assign hwmode after encoder state readout")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index e029dba96bca..c7d775f01b23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -17028,17 +17028,9 @@ static void intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
* the atomic core happy. It wants a valid mode if the
* crtc's enabled, so we do the above call.
*
- * At this point some state updated by the connectors
- * in their ->detect() callback has not run yet, so
- * no recalculation can be done yet.
- *
- * Even if we could do a recalculation and modeset
- * right now it would cause a double modeset if
- * fbdev or userspace chooses a different initial mode.
- *
- * If that happens, someone indicated they wanted a
- * mode change, which means it's safe to do a full
- * recalculation.
+ * But we don't set all the derived state fully, hence
+ * set a flag to indicate that a full recalculation is
+ * needed on the next commit.
*/
crtc->base.state->mode.private_flags = I915_MODE_FLAG_INHERITED;
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
