On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:47:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Hiler wrote: > > GuC historically has two "startup" functions called _init() and _setup() > > > > Then HuC came with it's _init() and _load(). > > > > To make naming more consistent this commit renames intel_guc_setup() to > > intel_guc_load() as it it seams more fitting (it's in intel_guc_loader.c > > after all). > > Or init_hw as that is the initialisation phase it is called from. > -Chris Since it's intel_guc_loader.c I somehow prefer _load() here. But intel_uc_load() which, is introduced with the series and call intel_guc_load() can be renamed to intel_uc_init_hw() What do you think? -- Cheers, Arek _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
