On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:44:39AM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On pe, 2016-12-16 at 07:46 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Simple test to just exercise calling the debug dumper on the drm_mm. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This is rather meta already. Not entirely sure how good of a selftest > this is when we do not validate the generated output, or do you at the > runner side? No, it is just to ensure we have coverage of that function. All it does is make sure it doesn't explode, under very tame circumstances. I thought of doing a few mocks to capture the output and decided that was asking a little too much for a debug function. Still don't have coverage for the debugfs dumper... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
