On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:29:59AM +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16900/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > Series 16900v1 drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16900/revisions/1/mbox/ > > > > Test gem_ringfill: > > Subgroup basic-default-hang: > > pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-4770) > running: igt/gem_ringfill/basic-default-hang > [117/247] skip: 8, pass: 109 / > Build timed out (after 17 minutes). Marking the build as aborted. > This might be a conflict caused by the initial patch which was discssed and then after agreeing that rather than moving to udelay() usleep:range with som adjustments would be the right way to go. are both patches queued now ? I think I caused the problem by changing the subject line of the patch while adding a V2 - because the original subject line was no longer corrct (it noted udely) - the V2 patch is marked as "rev 1" in patchwork though. not quite clear - anyway sorry if I made some sort of a mess here the patch applies cleanly on next-20161216. thx! hofrat _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
