Re: ??? Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 07:29:59AM +0000, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/16900/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 16900v1 drm/i915: relax uncritical udelay_range() settings
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/16900/revisions/1/mbox/
> > 
> > Test gem_ringfill:
> >         Subgroup basic-default-hang:
> >                 pass       -> INCOMPLETE (fi-hsw-4770)
> running: igt/gem_ringfill/basic-default-hang
> [117/247] skip: 8, pass: 109 /              
> Build timed out (after 17 minutes). Marking the build as aborted.
>
This might be a conflict caused by the initial patch which was discssed
and then after agreeing that rather than moving to udelay() usleep:range
with som adjustments would be the right way to go. 
are both patches queued now ?

I think I caused the problem by changing the subject line of the patch 
while adding a V2 - because the original subject line was no longer corrct
(it noted udely) - the V2 patch is marked as "rev 1" in patchwork though.
 
not quite clear - anyway sorry if I made some sort of a mess here
the patch applies cleanly on next-20161216.

thx!
hofrat
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux