On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 15-12-16 om 16:36 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >> Op 15-12-16 om 16:23 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >>>> Op 12-12-16 om 21:35 schreef ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > >>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> > >>>>> Add a test to try out all the different plane enable/disable > >>>>> order permutations. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Didn't look through the test, but sounds like > >>>> > >>>> kms_atomic_transitions.plane-*-transition-* ? > >>>> > >>>> Although that one tests a few more edge cases like modeset disable and nonblocking updates.. > >>> I don't immediately see where it would try all the permutations, nor can > >>> I see any crc_nonblock() stuff so doesn't seem like it could even spot > >>> transient errors. > >>> > >> I haven't done any crc test there yet, but the double loop in run_transition_test handles all combinations of planes. > > permutations > combinations > > > It permutates too, I used it for some basic wm testing before. :) Does it? I'm too lazy to reverse engineed it, so I just tried to run it but it didn't want to run, so meh. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
