Re: [PATCH 33/34] drm: Fix drm_mm search and insertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:28:32PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ma, 2016-12-12 at 11:53 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > @@ -799,7 +706,7 @@ bool drm_mm_scan_add_block(struct drm_mm_scan *scan,
> >  	if (adj_end <= adj_start || adj_end - adj_start < scan->size)
> >  		return false;
> >  
> > -	if (scan->flags == DRM_MM_CREATE_TOP)
> > +	if (scan->flags == DRM_MM_INSERT_HIGH)
> 
> Flags are usually checked with & if somebody wants to add them later.
> Otherwise you could call it "mode".

Once upon a time, they were intended to be flags. They have since
devolved back into a mode. The only suitable argument for my laziness
was what if I wanted to add a flag later!
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux