On ma, 2016-12-12 at 11:53 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Check that we add arbitrary blocks to the eviction scanner in order to
> find the first minimal hole that matches our request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<SNIP>
> + if ((int)tmp.start % n || tmp.size != nsize || tmp.hole_follows) {
> + pr_err("Inserted did not fill the eviction hole: size=%lld [%d], align=%d [rem=%d] (prime), start=%llx, hole-follows?=%d\n",
> + tmp.size, nsize, n, (int)tmp.start % n, tmp.start, tmp.hole_follows);
> +
> + drm_mm_remove_node(&tmp);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + drm_mm_remove_node(&tmp);
> + list_for_each_entry(e, &evict_list, link) {
> + err = drm_mm_reserve_node(&mm, &e->node);
Using helpers, could repeat the ordering tests for reserve vs insert.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
