Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Don't assume 60Hz when accounting for DSI pixel overlap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:09:17PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Compute the increase in the DSI clock due to pixel overlap mode in
> a way that's refresh rate agnostic. So far the computation assumed
> a 60Hz refresh rate. And let's switch to round to closest here as
> well since we would like to be as close to the target as possible.
> 
> Also toss in a decent comment explaining what we're actually doing
> here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Not totally why being under the target is acceptable? But the
conversion from vtotal*60 to clock/htotal looks sound.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux