Re: [PATCH 30/34] drm: Optimise power-of-two alignments in drm_mm_scan_add_block()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On ma, 2016-12-12 at 11:53 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> For power-of-two alignments, we can avoid the 64bit divide and do a
> simple bitwise add instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  include/drm/drm_mm.h     | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> index eec0a46f5b38..7245483f1111 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c
> @@ -741,8 +741,12 @@ void drm_mm_scan_init_with_range(struct drm_mm_scan *scan,
>  
>  	scan->mm = mm;
>  
> +	if (alignment <= 1)
> +		alignment = 0;
> +
>  	scan->color = color;
>  	scan->alignment = alignment;
> +	scan->alignment_mask = is_power_of_2(alignment) ? alignment - 1 : 0;

One would assume alignment_mask to be the bit-opposite, really.
reminder_mask should describe it better.

And sprinkle a likely() for the POT case, because I think that's
something to expect.

With above comments;

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux