On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:53:05 +0100
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just prep work to polish and consolidate all the dma-buf related
> documenation.
>
> Unfortunately I didn't discover a way to both integrate this new file
> into the overall toc while keeping it at the current place. Work
> around that by moving it into the overall driver-api/index.rst.
OK, I've applied this, with one change:
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index d51a7d23c358..c683c4e908d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -163,7 +163,6 @@ struct dma_fence_cb {
> * destruction of the fence. Can be called from irq context.
> * If pointer is set to NULL, kfree will get called instead.
> */
> -
> struct dma_fence_ops {
> const char * (*get_driver_name)(struct dma_fence *fence);
> const char * (*get_timeline_name)(struct dma_fence *fence);
This hunk didn't apply to my tree, but I figured that, under duress, we
could probably manage to do without it for now...:)
jon
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
