On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 03:19:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We can be more clever than that and merge the 2 list walking loops.
> It's all under the one mutex critical section anyway, so nothing funny
> can happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> index 64c2971478db..a6205a92dfee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> @@ -84,7 +84,6 @@ int drm_mode_getresources(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct drm_file *file_priv)
> {
> struct drm_mode_card_res *card_res = data;
> - struct list_head *lh;
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
> struct drm_connector *connector;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> @@ -105,25 +104,20 @@ int drm_mode_getresources(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>
>
> mutex_lock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
> - /*
> - * For the non-control nodes we need to limit the list of resources
> - * by IDs in the group list for this node
> - */
> - list_for_each(lh, &file_priv->fbs)
> - fb_count++;
> -
> /* handle this in 4 parts */
> /* FBs */
> - if (card_res->count_fbs >= fb_count) {
> - copied = 0;
> - fb_id = (uint32_t __user *)(unsigned long)card_res->fb_id_ptr;
> - list_for_each_entry(fb, &file_priv->fbs, filp_head) {
> - if (put_user(fb->base.id, fb_id + copied)) {
> - mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
> - return -EFAULT;
> - }
> - copied++;
> + copied = 0;
> + fb_id = (uint32_t __user *)(unsigned long)card_res->fb_id_ptr;
> + list_for_each_entry(fb, &file_priv->fbs, filp_head) {
> + fb_count++;
> + if (fb_count > card_res->count_fbs)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (put_user(fb->base.id, fb_id + copied)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&file_priv->fbs_lock);
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
> + copied++;
if (fb_count < card_res->count_fbs &&
put_user(fb->base.id fb_id + fb_count) {
}
fb_count++; // no need for copied
I'd just like for one style :) Otoh, this seems reasonable to apply to
crtc/encoders/connectors as well, and on the other we already have a
counter for the others. Hmm, setting count = copied in the previous
patch is thereby wrong (change in uABI).
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
