On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:45:24PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When DPMS was introduced to atomic, vblanks only worked when the crtc > was enabled and active. wait_for_vblanks were not converted to check for > crtc_state->active, which may cause an attempt for vblank_get to fail. > > This is probably harmless, but convert from enable to active anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > index 583f47f27b36..23767df72615 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c > @@ -1117,7 +1117,7 @@ drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks(struct drm_device *dev, > * vblank wait) in the ->enable boolean. */ > old_crtc_state->enable = false; > > - if (!crtc->state->enable) > + if (!crtc->state->active) Hm, with this change we /should/ be able to make the drm_crtc_vblank_get call a few lines below WARN when it fails. Not doing that was only done at first because there was no accurate active state tracking for the CRTC, and since the vblank state should match active I've used that. Care for that follow-up patch? Applied this one here meanwhile. -Daniel > continue; > > /* Legacy cursor ioctls are completely unsynced, and userspace > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx