Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Test all fw tables during mock selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/12/2016 18:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
In addition to just testing the fw table we load, during the initial
mock testing we can test that all tables are valid (so the testing is
not limited to just the platforms that load that particular table).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mock_selftests.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c        | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mock_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mock_selftests.h
index 34f32f777b34..d2c469eba1dc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mock_selftests.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mock_selftests.h
@@ -11,4 +11,5 @@
 selftest(objects, i915_gem_object_selftests)
 selftest(requests, i915_gem_request_selftest)
 selftest(breadcrumbs, intel_breadcrumbs_selftest)
+selftest(uncore, intel_uncore_mock_selftests)
 selftest(sanitycheck, i915_mock_sanitycheck) /* keep last */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index bd8436b8f3a4..8ad93acbb16f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -1918,20 +1918,16 @@ intel_uncore_forcewake_for_reg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
 #include "i915_selftest.h"

-static int intel_fw_table_check(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+static int intel_fw_table_check(const struct intel_forcewake_range *ranges,
+				unsigned int num_ranges,
+				int gen)
 {
-	const struct intel_forcewake_range *ranges;
-	unsigned int num_ranges, i;
+	unsigned int i;
 	s32 prev;

-	ranges = i915->uncore.fw_domains_table;
-	if (!ranges)
-		return 0;
-
-	num_ranges = i915->uncore.fw_domains_table_entries;
 	for (i = 0, prev = -1; i < num_ranges; i++, ranges++) {
 		/* Check that the tabke is watertight */
-		if (WARN_ON(IS_GEN9(i915) && (prev + 1) != (s32)ranges->start))
+		if (WARN_ON(gen >= 9 && (prev + 1) != (s32)ranges->start))
 			return -EINVAL;

 		/* Check that the table never goes backwards */
@@ -1965,11 +1961,38 @@ static int intel_shadow_table_check(void)
 	return 0;
 }

+int intel_uncore_mock_selftests(void)
+{
+	struct {
+		const struct intel_forcewake_range *ranges;
+		unsigned int num_ranges;
+		int gen;
+	} fw[] = {
+		{ __vlv_fw_ranges, ARRAY_SIZE(__vlv_fw_ranges), 7 },
+		{ __chv_fw_ranges, ARRAY_SIZE(__chv_fw_ranges), 8 },
+		{ __gen9_fw_ranges, ARRAY_SIZE(__gen9_fw_ranges), 9 },

Tables are not per gen so this is a bit confusing. I don't have a much better idea though. Apart from replacing "int gen" with "bool test_watertight"?

+	};
+	int err, i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fw); i++) {
+		err = intel_fw_table_check(fw[i].ranges,
+					   fw[i].num_ranges,
+					   fw[i].gen);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 int intel_uncore_late_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 {
 	int err;

-	err = intel_fw_table_check(i915);
+	/* Confirm the table we load is still valid */
+	err = intel_fw_table_check(i915->uncore.fw_domains_table,
+				   i915->uncore.fw_domains_table_entries,
+				   INTEL_GEN(i915));
 	if (err)
 		return err;



Either way,

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux