On 2016-12-07 06:06 AM, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:52:09PM -0500, Robert Foss wrote:Add igt_require_sw_sync to provide tests to skip if sw_sync support isn't available on the host machine. Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- lib/sw_sync.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/sw_sync.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/sw_sync.c b/lib/sw_sync.c index a2168f78..d4ecc898 100644 --- a/lib/sw_sync.c +++ b/lib/sw_sync.c @@ -194,3 +194,25 @@ int sync_fence_count_status(int fd, int status) igt_assert_f(count >= 0, "No fences with supplied status found"); return count; } + +static bool kernel_has_sw_sync(void) +{ + bool err; + + igt_ignore_warn(system("/sbin/modprobe -s r sw_sync")); + + err = false; + if (access(DEVFS_SW_SYNC, R_OK | W_OK) < 0) { + char buf[128]; + + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s/sw_sync", igt_debugfs_mount()); + err = access(DEBUGFS_SW_SYNC, R_OK | W_OK) < 0; + }Did you mean access(buf, R_OK | W_OK) here?
Yes, fixing this in v11. Thanks!
-- Petri Latvala
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
