On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:23:13PM +0000, Matthew Auld wrote:
> In a similar spirit to GEM_BUG_ON we now also have GEM_WARN_ON, this
> will enable us to freely add warnings which our CI will hopefully catch
> but without fear of impacting production machines.
Impacting performance?
>
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> index 51ec793f2e20..04c777e6d0bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,10 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM
> #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUG_ON(expr)
> +#define GEM_WARN_ON(expr) WARN_ON(expr)
> #else
> #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) do { } while (0)
> +#define GEM_WARN_ON(expr) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> #define I915_NUM_ENGINES 5
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
