On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:54:12PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ti, 2016-11-29 at 09:50 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > 99% of the time we access i915_address_space->dev we want the i915 > > device and not the drm device, so let's store the drm_i915_private > > backpointer instead. The only real complication here are the inlines > > in i915_vma.h where drm_i915_private is not yet defined and so we have > > to choose an alternate path for our asserts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Agreed. i915_vma.h can be untangled in the future. > > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Oops, pushed before realising CI is still playing catch up. Hopefully no problems... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
