Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix compilation warnings on maybe uninitialized pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 29/11/2016 08:56, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:43:19PM -0500, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
Two warnings are produced by gcc (tested with gcc 6.2.1):

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c: In function ‘csr_load_work_fn’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c:400:5: error: ‘fw’ is used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
  if (fw)
       ^
and

In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:47:0,
                 from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:30:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c: In function ‘intel_guc_init’:
./include/drm/drmP.h:228:2: error: ‘fw’ may be used uninitialized in this
function  -Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
  drm_printk(KERN_DEBUG, DRM_UT_DRIVER, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
  ^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:595:25: note: ‘fw’ was declared here
  const struct firmware *fw;
                         ^~

When CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR is set, those warnings break the build.

Initializing fw pointer to NULL in both cases removes the warnings.

Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.

I just wanted to reply with two things; first who can figure out why this hasn't been picked up by the compiler before? Or why GCC 6.2.1 on my machine does not complain? Looks like a real mystery!

And secondly the csr loader is not even checking the return code. I was about to suggest a v2 but never mind now. Can do it myself.

Regards,

Tvrtko

-Daniel

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c        | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
index d7a04bc..3520b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void csr_load_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
 	struct intel_csr *csr;
-	const struct firmware *fw;
+	const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
 	int ret;

 	dev_priv = container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), csr.work);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 34d6ad2..ecfee49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void guc_fw_fetch(struct drm_device *dev, struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = dev->pdev;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
-	const struct firmware *fw;
+	const struct firmware *fw = NULL;
 	struct guc_css_header *css;
 	size_t size;
 	int err;
--
2.10.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux