On 28/11/2016 14:36, Chris Wilson wrote:
This reverts commit 27745e829a5c ("drm/i915/execlists: Use a local lock
for dfs_link access") as the struct_mutex was required to prevent
concurrent retiring and freeing, now restored in the previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 0a09024d6ca3..b2c0d509e191 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -695,7 +695,6 @@ pt_lock_engine(struct i915_priotree *pt, struct intel_engine_cs *locked)
static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
{
- static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
struct intel_engine_cs *engine = NULL;
struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
struct i915_dependency stack;
@@ -704,8 +703,8 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
if (prio <= READ_ONCE(request->priotree.priority))
return;
- /* Need global lock to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
- mutex_lock(&lock);
+ /* Need BKL in order to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&request->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
stack.signaler = &request->priotree;
list_add(&stack.dfs_link, &dfs);
@@ -772,8 +771,6 @@ static void execlists_schedule(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, int prio)
if (engine)
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->timeline->lock);
- mutex_unlock(&lock);
-
/* XXX Do we need to preempt to make room for us and our deps? */
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
