On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:57:01PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > commit 848496e5902833600f7992f4faa82dc1546051ba > Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Jul 13 16:32:03 2016 +0300 > > drm/i915: Wait up to 3ms for the pcu to ack the cdclk change request on SKL > > increased the timeout to match the spec, but we still see a timeout on > at least one SKL. A CDCLK change request following the failed one will > succeed nevertheless, so let's try to increase the timeout to 10ms. > > v2: > - Use 1ms poll period instead of 10us. (Chris) I'm not sure that's what we want. IIRC the spec says no delay between attempts, so I'm not sure this isn't just going to make it more likely to fail. > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97929 > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 5d11002..f07b611 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -6261,7 +6261,7 @@ static bool skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > static bool skl_cdclk_wait_for_pcu_ready(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > { > - return _wait_for(skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv), 3000, 10) == 0; > + return wait_for(skl_cdclk_pcu_ready(dev_priv), 10) == 0; > } > > static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int cdclk, int vco) > -- > 2.5.0 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
