From: "A.Sunil Kamath" <sunil.kamath@xxxxxxxxx>
Better to use num_scaler itself while printing scaler_info.
This fixes a bug of printing information for the missing
second scaler on pipe C for SKL platform.
Signed-off-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 1cc971c..6c39881 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3081,7 +3081,7 @@ static void intel_scaler_info(struct seq_file *m, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_users,
pipe_config->scaler_state.scaler_id);
- for (i = 0; i < SKL_NUM_SCALERS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num_scalers; i++) {
struct intel_scaler *sc =
&pipe_config->scaler_state.scalers[i];
--
2.8.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
