Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/i915: optimise intel_runtime_pm_{get, put}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:36:47PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> Benchmarking shows that on resume we spend quite a bit of time
> just taking and dropping these references, leaving us two options;
> either rewriting the code not to take these references more than
> once, which would be a rather invasive change since the involved
> functions are used from other places, or to optimise
> intel_runtime_pm_{get,put}().  This patch does the latter.
> Initial benchmarking indicate improvements of a couple
> of milliseconds on resume.
> 
> Original patch by Chris, with slight fixes by me.
> 
> v2: Fix missing return value (Patchwork)
>     Remove extra atomic_dec() (Chris)
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I'm happy with this. Not amused that it apparently saves quite a bit of
overhead with frequent pm_runtime calls.

Imre?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux