On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:37:30AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Benchmarking shows that on resume we spend quite a bit of time
> > just taking and dropping these references, leaving us two options;
> > either rewriting the code not to take these references more than
> > once, which would be a rather invasive change since the involved
> > functions are used from other places, or to optimise
> > intel_runtime_pm_{get,put}(). This patch does the latter.
> > Initial benchmarking indicate improvements of a couple
> > of milliseconds on resume.
> >
> > Original patch by Chris, with slight fixes by me.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 356c662ad453..4bf279023b39 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -2632,6 +2632,9 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> > struct device *kdev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > + if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count))
> > + return;
> > +
> > pm_runtime_get_sync(kdev);
> >
> > atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
> > @@ -2653,6 +2656,9 @@ bool intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> > struct device *kdev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > + if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count))
> > + return;
> > +
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)) {
> > int ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(kdev);
> >
> > @@ -2695,6 +2701,9 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> > struct device *kdev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > + if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count))
> > + return;
> > +
> > assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
> > pm_runtime_get_noresume(kdev);
> >
> > @@ -2714,6 +2723,9 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_priv->drm.pdev;
> > struct device *kdev = &pdev->dev;
> >
> > + if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count))
> > + return;
> > +
> > assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
> > atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
>
> Have to remove this dec. Time to retest ;-)
Will retest with that (and fix the return-type error).
Kind regards, David
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
